Les meilleurs pneus pour la Honda Accord iVtec Type S saloon

Mieux que pzero nero gt, Sur ma voiture sont superbes, l'usure c'est ok, ils ont comme 5,5-6mm après 17k km, en deux saisons, maintenant c'est la saison 3, et ils tiennent très bien. Je suis très heureux avec eux.

Je conduis ces pneus sur ma Honda Accord 2.4 iVtec (2004) depuis deux hivers. Ils se sont avérés très bons sur l'asphalte humide et sec à basse température. Je n'ai pas vraiment eu l'occasion de les tester sur des routes correctement couvertes de neige, mais quelques centimètres de neige sur la route ne seront pas un problème pour ce pneu tant au freinage qu'en accélération. Je les ai parcourus pendant environ 10 km et je ne peux pas vraiment donner une marque d'usure réaliste.

Pneu cher, mais je suis très déçu, il n'y a pas de retour, ils ne mettent pas bien la puissance à la route, flancs très mous, ne réagissent pas bien quand on tourne. À haute vitesse très bancal, comme floaty , pas stable à haute vitesse, construction non sécurisée à haute vitesse. Je n'achèterai plus jamais Michelin. Très cher aussi, les MPS4S ont également des flancs souples.

J'ai remplacé mon Michelin PS3 / 4 par ces pneus sur ma Honda Accord Type S et je dois dire que je les adore. Par rapport au PS, pour moi, ils gèrent mieux. Peut-être même une meilleure adhérence sur sol sec et mouillé. Michelin était meilleur sur le virage initial car il avait des parois latérales plus rigides et plus dures. Ces pneus ont des côtés plus minces. Mais après cela, oh garçon, bienvenue dans le monde de l'adhérence. Peut-être qu'ils sont un peu plus à l'aise que les pilotes.

Hi guys, I live/drive in Guatemala City, Central America. We have TERRIBLE roads here, all varieties of roads, concrete (very few), asphalt/tarmac, "cratery" roads (lots of harsh hits on contact patch, sidewalls when trying to avoid holes, etc.), muddy roads,
flooded roads, hydroplaning roads, stony paths, etc., etc., etc... and the "fun" part is that you find them anywhere in the cities or rural. Having said that and being fair to ANY tyre brand, after 33,000 kms (20k miles) of spirited roads and spirited driving style on my 2009 Honda Accord V6 sedan I have to congratulate my 225/50 R17 Michelin Energy XM2 tyres, very good wear (lots of harsh hits on contact patch, sidewalls when trying to avoid holes, etc.), very good grip, good handling, BUT noisy and too much feedback. Yesterday I had my first tyre flat due to a very sharp pothole, it flattened after driving 20 miles, while parked, I took it for repair (very normal AND CHEAP to repair a tyre here in my country) but I got bad news... the sidewall was punctured like knife so I replaced it with a Dunlop SP Sport LM704 which I put it in the front along with the spare tyre (brand new 225/50 R17 Michelin Energy XM2 with brand new original rim from factory), took the "old" front tyre for spare tyre now... "problem solved". Just for you to know, a new 225/50 R17 Michelin Energy XM2 tyre cost here US$130 versus a new Dunlop SP Sport LM704 cost US$90... by the way a tyre repair here is US$6 aprox.

Drive safely.

Replaced 2 Bridgestone front tyres with the Falken 914 Ecorun, and I am very impressed, they are every bit as good. The grip in the dry is absolutely perfect, as are many tyres. However the wet grip has really impressed me. I tend to drive a little bit enthusiastically, and the Accord has 155 hp so it's not a total slouch, and I have never had a problem with these tyres. I have tested them in the wet on a quiet road nearby that has a new smooth tarmac surface, and they were faultless. I found it very difficult to get a skid doing emergency stops, only the ABS would activate on extreme braking. Also tried throwing it around roundabouts and turns with plenty of steering lock but got none of that graunching or slipping that you would sometimes get, and even got with the previous Bridgestones. At nearly half the price of premium brands, I would highly recommend these tyres, but mostly on performance, not price. I read a lot of reviews before buying these tyres, and the positive reports are accurate, at least for my size and type of vehicle / tyre. Buy with confidence!

Noisy, too soft and i dont feel that they are in any kind of contact with road. They do a solid job in every day driving, when drive is slow and relaxed. If you wont to feel some speed, that is where problems ocure. And they don't last long either!

Went from Yokohama Advan V105 to Federal 595 RSR to Nankang NS2R 180tw/medium compound. On my 280HP Accord with race suspension Yokohama was the safest tyre on wet, lasted for 21K miles and offer surprising grip in corners. On dry public roads was 90% performance of semi-slicks, 140% of performance on wet, and 200% of performance in cold around 0'C conditions and much quieter and civilised ride. Very nicely balance tyre but for ultimate grip and feedback you can't beat semi-slicks.
These Nankang NS2R are the only semi-slicks I know, please correct me, that last long enough, is not utterly useless on wet and does not brake the bank. Its even 30Euro cheaper a corner then Yokohama and that's enough to me to buy the Nankang again but for the same price and daily driven car reason would tell me Yokohs but the rest of the body will disagree. Try them both!

Went from Yokohama Advan V105 to Federal 595 RSR to Nankang NS2R 180tw/medium compound. On my 280HP Accord with race suspension setup after 8K miles I still can see another 5K !
On dry there are real race tyre like a Federal RSR which might have an edge in high speed race applications but you must be mad to use both of them on public roads in full potential.
On wet miles ahead of Federal RSR which I found rather dangerous then fun on wet roads.
Yokohama was the safest tyre on wet, lasted for 21K miles and offer surprising grip in corners. On dry public roads was 90% performance of semi-slicks, 140% of performance on wet, and 200% of performance in cold around 0'C conditions and much quieter and civilised ride. Very nicely balance tyre but for ultimate grip and feedback you can't beat semi-slicks.
These Nankang NS2R are the only semi-slicks I know, please correct me, that last long enough, is not utterly useless on wet and does not brake the bank. Its even 30Euro cheaper a corner then Yokohama and that's enough to me to buy the Nankang again but for the same price and daily driven car reason would tell me Yokohs but the rest of the body will disagree. Try them!

After 12000 miles there is still enough rubber on the tyres, I guess that will make another 5-6 k before changing them.

Driving under 35 miles/hour they are not noisy, however over 35 they are.

Dry grip is good but on the wet now with 2 mm rubber on the front, I don't like them. If you accelerate just a little fast the fronts spin and it becomes dangerous especially if you are on a corner. Breaking though still feels quite ok.

For a budget tyre they are ok to fit imo comparing price/quality. It's half the price of a premium brand and offer some quite acceptable performance. And they last at least the same number of miles if not more.

Given I had researched a lot, I admit that I expected more from this tyres, but ok, I am not dissatisfied. However, next time I will search for something else. I