Menu

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

3 pneus comparés 8 tests partagés Ete
Tyre Reviews9.3
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
4
Wins
1
Draw
3
Losses
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Ete · Tourisme Premium
Tyre Reviews9.0
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
2
Wins
1
Draw
5
Losses
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Ete · Tourisme Premium
Tyre Reviews8.9
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
1
Win
0
Draws
7
Losses

Ajuster la pondération des catégories

Modifiez l'importance de chaque catégorie de performance pour observer comment différentes priorités affectent le classement général sur l'ensemble des tests partagés.

Sec 35%
Mouillé 50%
Confort 5%
Valeur 10%
Sec 35% · Mouillé 50% · Confort 5% · Valeur 10%
Affiner les sous-catégories
Sec
Mouillé
Confort
Valeur
RangPneuScoreSecMouilléConfortValeur
1Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 298.4%98.7%98.9%100%94.1%
2Kumho Ecsta HS5298%99.9%98.6%96.4%89.1%
3Hankook Ventus Prime 497%99.3%97.9%98.6%84.2%

Répartition par catégorie

Analyses détaillées

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [s] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Dry Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [s] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Wet Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [s] (lower is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Subj. Comfort [Points] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Tyre Weight [Kg] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Bilan victoires/nuls/défaites test par test
Tests inclus dans cette comparaison