Menu

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs GT-Radial FE2 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

4 pneus comparés 6 tests partagés Ete
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Ete · Tourisme Premium
Tyre Reviews8.6
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
2
Wins
0
Draws
4
Losses
GT-Radial FE2
GT-Radial FE2
Ete · Ultra Haute Performance
Tyre Reviews7.8
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
6
Losses
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Ete · Tourisme Premium
Tyre Reviews9.0
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
2
Wins
0
Draws
4
Losses
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Ete · Tourisme Premium
Tyre Reviews8.9
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
2
Wins
0
Draws
4
Losses

Ajuster la pondération des catégories

Modifiez l'importance de chaque catégorie de performance pour observer comment différentes priorités affectent le classement général sur l'ensemble des tests partagés.

Sec 35%
Mouillé 50%
Confort 5%
Valeur 10%
Sec 35% · Mouillé 50% · Confort 5% · Valeur 10%
Affiner les sous-catégories
Sec
Mouillé
Confort
Valeur
RangPneuScoreSecMouilléConfortValeur
1Hankook Ventus Prime 498.7%99.4%98.9%97%96.6%
2Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun98.4%98.6%99.7%99.4%91.1%
3Kumho Ecsta HS5298.1%99.9%97.7%95.1%95.2%
4GT-Radial FE295.6%97.3%95.1%97.5%91.2%

Répartition par catégorie

Analyses détaillées

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [s] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Dry Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [s] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Wet Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [s] (lower is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Subj. Comfort [Points] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Tyre Weight [Kg] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Bilan victoires/nuls/défaites test par test
Tests inclus dans cette comparaison