Menu

Yokohama Advan Sport V107 vs Continental PremiumContact 7

2 pneus comparés 7 tests partagés Ete
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Ete · Ultra Haute Performance
Tyre Reviews7.8
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
1
Win
0
Draws
6
Losses
Continental PremiumContact 7
Continental PremiumContact 7
Ete · Tourisme Premium
Tyre Reviews9.9
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
6
Wins
0
Draws
1
Loss

Ajuster la pondération des catégories

Modifiez l'importance de chaque catégorie de performance pour observer comment différentes priorités affectent le classement général sur l'ensemble des tests partagés.

Sec 35%
Mouillé 50%
Confort 5%
Valeur 10%
Sec 35% · Mouillé 50% · Confort 5% · Valeur 10%
Affiner les sous-catégories
Sec
Mouillé
Confort
Valeur
RangPneuScoreSecMouilléConfortValeur
1Continental PremiumContact 799.3%98.3%100%100%98.7%
2Yokohama Advan Sport V10795.4%99.9%94.7%96%82.5%

Répartition par catégorie

Analyses détaillées

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [s] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Dry Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Subj. Fun [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Cool [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Worn [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [s] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Wet Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [s] (lower is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Subj. Comfort [Points] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Abrasion [g] (lower is better)
Bilan victoires/nuls/défaites test par test
RangPneuVictoiresTiragesPertes
1Continental PremiumContact 7601
2Yokohama Advan Sport V107106
Tests inclus dans cette comparaison