Menu
Comparaison de plusieurs pneus - Comparaison de 2 pneus avec des données de test partagées

Vredestein Ultrac vs Kumho Ecsta HS52

Cette analyse comparative porte sur 6 tests de pneus indépendants où tous les 2 pneus ont été testés ensemble, fournissant une analyse directe face à face.

Classement

RangPneuVictoiresTiragesPertes
1Kumho Ecsta HS52510
2Vredestein Ultrac015

Répartition par catégorie

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [s] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Dry Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [s] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Wet Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [s] (lower is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Subj. Comfort [Points] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)

Tests inclus dans cette comparaison

Tyres in this comparison

Quick specs plus how they fared in the shared tests.
2
Vredestein Ultrac
Vredestein Ultrac
Voiture de tourisme · Ete · Haute Performance
8.1/10 score22 reviews
3rd
Best result
P10.83
Avg finish
0-1-5
W/D/L
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Voiture de tourisme · Ete · Tourisme Premium
8.7/10 score21 reviews
2nd
Best result
P4.33
Avg finish
5-1-0
W/D/L