Menu

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Firestone RoadHawk vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

4 pneus comparés 2 tests partagés Ete
Tyre Reviews9.3
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
2
Losses
Firestone RoadHawk
Firestone RoadHawk
Ete · Tourisme Premium
Tyre Reviews7.9
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
2
Losses
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Ete · Tourisme Premium
Tyre Reviews9.0
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
1
Win
0
Draws
1
Loss
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Ete · Tourisme Premium
Tyre Reviews8.7
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
1
Win
0
Draws
1
Loss

Ajuster la pondération des catégories

Modifiez l'importance de chaque catégorie de performance pour observer comment différentes priorités affectent le classement général sur l'ensemble des tests partagés.

Sec 35%
Mouillé 50%
Confort 5%
Valeur 10%
Sec 35% · Mouillé 50% · Confort 5% · Valeur 10%
Affiner les sous-catégories
Sec
Mouillé
Confort
Valeur
RangPneuScoreSecMouilléConfortValeur
1Kumho Ecsta HS5297.2%100%98.4%98.9%80.7%
2Firestone RoadHawk96.2%98.2%97.3%97%83.7%
3Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 296.1%98.3%94.2%100%95.8%
4Bridgestone Turanza 695.4%97.4%96.9%97.6%79.4%

Répartition par catégorie

Analyses détaillées

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Bilan victoires/nuls/défaites test par test
Tests inclus dans cette comparaison